American Sniper By Chris Kyle - 1435 Words

Love, an intense feeling of deep affection. loving someone so much, willing to do anything to make that person or place. Perseverance, Steadfastness in doing something despite difficulty or delay in achieving success. The movie of American Sniper was based off of a true story of Chris Kyle. Chris Kyle Joined the Navy Seals leaving his wife and kids to protect his country. Throughout the movie it shows how being faithful and perseverance plays a big role in the world we are living in. Based on the complexity and actions of the characters, imagery, symbolism and the angles the camera took, the movie, â€Å" American Sniper† illuminates and emcopasses a theme of Love and Perseverance. First of all, the movie â€Å"American Sniper† is a film about the†¦show more content†¦The other two nominations came from Best Writing, Adapted screenplay, and for Best Achievement In Film editing. The last one was for Best Achievement in Sound Mixing. The American Sniper movie end up winning the oscar for Best Achievement in Sound Editing (trumbo). First off, Love shows itself many times throughout the movie American Sniper through the complexity and actions of the varied characters. Some of characters play a much bigger role in identify the theme than do others. Taya, Chris Kyle wife known for being a humble wife. Even Though She didn’t like the idea of Chris being at War killing enemies or enemies killing him. When Chris decided to go to war, she didn’t divorce or leave him. Several times, She told Chris not to go back to War, however Chris refused. Many wife in this situation will divorce or leave them but she never did. While Chris was at War, she stayed faithful by not cheating on Chris and supporting him with his missions when he was at War. What kept them from being divorced was Love. The main character Chris kyle also reveals how much love he had toward his Navy Seals Team by always being there with them to help protect their country. In the move Chris was ask by his wife if he was ever thinks about who wi ll be at the end of his gun, and his response was, â€Å" I just wants to protect his Country†. Chris has Kids that he have to takeShow MoreRelatedThe American Sniper By Chris Kyle1307 Words   |  6 Pages â€Å"Al-Shaitan† â€Å"The American Sniper† by Chris Kyle is an account of the deadliest American sniper ever. He was called â€Å"the devil† by the enemies he hunted and â€Å"the legend† by his Navy SEAL brothers. From 1999 to 2009, U.S. Navy SEAL Chris Kyle recorded the most career sniper kills in United States military history. The Pentagon has officially confirmed more than 150 of Kyle s kills (the previous American record was 109). Iraqi insurgents feared Kyle so much they named him Al-ShaitanRead MoreAmerican Sniper By Chris Kyle1107 Words   |  5 Pagesshot, one kill†. American Sniper is written by Chris Kyle, and is an account of his four tours in the Iraq War as a Navy SEAL while earning his spot in history as the most lethal sniper in the United States military. During Kyle’s tours in Fallujah, Ramadi, and Sadr city he recorded over 160 confirmed kills. Kyle’s autobiography covers not only daily life on the war front, but the personal and family s truggles at home while on hiatus from the War in Iraq. In American Sniper Chris Kyle provides insightRead MoreAmerican Sniper by Chris Kyle826 Words   |  3 PagesAmerican Sniper by Chris Kyle, is one of the most accurate depictions of the life in special operations as a US Navy Seal. Chris is the most lethal sniper in US. military history. With over 160 confirmed kills between 2003 to 2009. American Sniper is about the in depth happenings inside the Iraq War through the eyes of Seal Team 3. Specifically Chris Kyle. Chris joined the Navy in 1999 where shortly after, he would go to BUD/S training, Basic Underwater Demolition School. There, he went through theRead MoreHow Chris Kyle Was The Most Lethal Sniper During American History And For His Autobiography American Sniper1685 Words   |  7 Pagesany of these practices during combat operations out of necessity to save lives. Chris Kyle was a U.S. Navy Seal sniper during the battle of Rhamadi in 2006. Chris is known as the most lethal sniper in American history and for his autobiography American Sniper. The website visionary leader.org says that â€Å"visionary leaders require core values, clear vision, empowering relationships and innovative action†. Chris Kyle displayed these characteristics throughout his career. However, his most notableRead MoreArchetypal Analysis : American Sniper1003 Words   |  5 PagesAmerican Sniper: An Archetypal Analysis The movie American sniper is produced by Bradley Cooper, Clint Eastwood, Peter Morgan, Robert Lorenz, Andrew Lazar. American Sniper was released in 2014, and America feels sympathy for this unfortunately true story. American sniper is about a Navy S.E.A.L, Chris Kyle, who is played by award winning Bradley Cooper. Chris Kyles is a confirmed sniper legend, taking on four tours in Iraq to protect his comrades. He faces much internal conflict in this time periodRead MoreAnalysis Of The Movie American Sniper 1354 Words   |  6 PagesChris Kyle – American Sniper The film American Sniper chronicles the events of one of the most celebrated marksmen in the United States. Christopher Scott Kyle was born and raised in western Texas. He possessed a fondness toward firearms from an early age and frequently participated in hunting expeditions. According to Adam Bernstein, an obituary editor for the Washington Post, Kyle dreamed â€Å"†¦to be a cowboy and†¦to be in the military.† To fulfill the former, he attended Tarleton State UniversityRead MoreAmerican Sniper Analysis1487 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿How does Clint Eastwood generate emotional response in ‘American Sniper’ (2014) I am going to micro analyse the scene from ‘American sniper’ when Chris Kyle, played by Bradley Cooper shoots a Taliban soldier carrying a rocket launcher and a little boy then picks it up. American Sniper is a film based on the biography of Chris Kyle (America’s most dangerous sniper), it was released in 2014 and was directed by Clint Eastwood. This essay will focus on the way that key micro features help to createRead MoreAnalysis Of The Movie American Sniper 1641 Words   |  7 PagesNavy SEAL ,Chris Kyle was just the average die hard Texan. He aspired to become a cowboy, but it wasn’t working out in his favor. After seeing the horrors of terrorism on 9/11 he was ready to fight for his country and enlisted into the military. He goes on to fight in four tours and becomes the deadliest sniper in American history. After each tour, he felt that he had to go back. He had two goals that he couldn’t give up on; protecting his team and taking out the de adliest enemy sniper, Mustafa. ChrisRead MoreAnalysis Of The Movie American Sniper 1550 Words   |  7 Pagesscene of the movie American Sniper, â€Å"which tells the story of Chris Kyle, a Navy SEAL who shot his way to 160 confirmed kills in Iraq,† (Buckley) starts out when Chris Kyle was just a child and him and his father are out in the forest shooting deer and him beating up a bully who was picking on his little brother at school. Later on into Kyle s young adulthood he made a decision to quit being a cowboy rodeo star and instead enlist with the Navy SEALS in 1998. During this time Kyle meets his futureRead MoreThe Greatest Sniper Is Chris Kyle1312 Words   |  6 PagesChris Kyle The world’s greatest sniper is Chris Kyle. Born in Texas, Chris was the best man anyone could ask for. Chris was a bull rider for the longest time. Later he joined the Navy Seals. He was the best sniper they had ever had with over 150 confirmed kills. Chris Kyle was and will always be the best sniper ever. Christopher Scott Kyle was raised in Texas and was a United States Navy SEAL from 1999 to 2009. He is at present known as the best marksman in American military history. As demonstrated

Essay on The Scarlet Letter - 553 Words

The Scarlet Letter is a story that illustrates the lifestyle of Puritans in Massachusetts in 17th century. Nathaniel Hawthorne takes the theme of sin committed by Hester Prynne prior to her affair with Arthur Dimmesdale and shows how it affects the lives of the people involved. Convicted of adultery by Bostons Puritan leaders, she is forced to wear a bright red A as a symbol of adultery over her breast to represent her wrongdoing to the townspeople. As a result of this sin a child is born, named Pearl. Dimmesdale feels his guilt in the shared sin, but he is unable to reveal the truth. However, the society punishes him as well. The society in which he lived suggested him the moral values that become the law of his inner self. Having†¦show more content†¦The governor, judges, priests view the issue of Hester Prynne as a cause to threaten all potential sinners in town. So, she is led through the crowd to the scaffold of the pillory that represents a symbol of public shame. The crowds of people approve the severity and strictness of the authorities; moreover, one of the women affirms that Hester deserves the death. Nevertheless, the society is also sinful. The magic scarlet sign helps Hester discover sinners from the crowd. gt; Consequently, Hester Prynne is isolated from society. She considers her exile as the greatest tragedy. However, Hawthorne demonstrates how suffering and loneliness harden her will. Instead of escaping from society, Hester helps and makes good to the people who punished her severely. gt; In The Scarlet Letter; Hawthorne uses symbols to supply the meaning of his work. The example of this is the symbol of the forest. It plays an important role in the book. Hawthorn mentions very often that the forest knows a hidden secret. That induces the reader to suppose that the Hesters sin is committed there. She and Arthur feel themselves comfortable and totally free as they are walking in the forest because the laws of society have no force there. That is the place where they can flee from society and show their love, but the most important is that they can reveal the truth to each other, not embarrassing of who theyShow MoreRelatedThe Scarlet Letter1659 Words   |  7 PagesThe Scarlet Letter The Scarlet Letter is a well known novel written by Nathaniel Hawthorne. The novel is composed and written in Salem and Concord, as well as Boston, Massachusetts in the late 1840s. The narrator of the novel is in an omniscent state, meaning he knows more about the characters than the characters know about themselves. Although the narrartor is omniscent, he also makes sure to include his ideas and opinions on situations, making him also greatly subjective. Being subjectiveRead MoreThe Scarlet Letter1456 Words   |  6 Pagesa Christ figure in The Scarlet Letter. She displays self-sacrifice, saintlike features, and exemplifies some biblical teachings throughout the book. The first, which is self-sacrifice, is shown when Hester is standing on the scaffold in front of the whole town and will not uncover the other participant in the adultery. Reverend Wilson questions her of this man that helped commit this crime, â€Å"Speak out thy name! That, and thy repentance, may ava il to take the scarlet letter off thy breast† (60), withRead More The Scarlet Letter801 Words   |  4 PagesThe aspect of Nature in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter seems to have been characterized to readers with a mixed blessing. In other words, Nature shows its power to both heal as well as harm various characters throughout the text. The Scarlet Letter highlights Natures complexity by showing that the Puritan idea of Nature as an entirely evil force is a naive misconception. The text reveals the beneficial attributes of Nature that the Puritans overlook or fear. Conversely, the text showsRead MoreScarlet Letter. The Scarlet Letter Has Five Scenes And1290 Words   |  6 PagesScarlet Letter The scarlet letter has five scenes and without them the story would not make any sense. All of the scenes either shed light on Hester situation in the puritan colony, they tell about the malice in Chillingworth s heart, or the sorrow and forgiveness of Dimmesdale. The first scene with Hester s punishment. The second scene is about Chillingworth s plan that finally turns his heart to stone. The third scene when the reader learns about the connections Hester, Dimmesdale, and ChillingworthRead MoreSymbolism Of The Scarlet Letter753 Words   |  4 PagesThe Scarlet Letter: Symbolism of the Scarlet ‘A’ Symbolism has many different meanings, and the Scarlet ‘A’ in â€Å"The Scarlet Letter† has many different meanings as well. Hester Prynne is the main character who is forced to wear the scarlet letter as remembrance for the crime and the sin that she has committed. This letter completely ruined her reputation in her community. How could a small piece of fabric do so much harm? This letter was a representation of something much greater than the letter ‘A’Read MoreSymbols In The Scarlet Letter1023 Words   |  5 PagesKaci Peeler Ms. Ortiz, Period 4 English Language and Composition AP 06 June 2017 The Scarlet Letter Analysis In the book, â€Å"The Scarlet Letter,† by Nathaniel Hawthorne, many symbols can be found. Hawthorne uses symbols such as the scarlet letter itself, which could represent things like determination, hard work, and a punishment. Another symbol he uses is the forest and the wilderness, which represents Hester and Pearl’s freedom from society as they explore the forest. The last symbol that seemedRead MoreSummary Of The Scarlet Letter 1436 Words   |  6 PagesThe Scarlet Letter Journal 1 I empathize most with Reverend Dimmesdale. He had to live with the secret of his sin for many years. He also was a reverend and had to preach about sins every Sunday and so was reminded constantly of what he did. In fact he felt so guilty about receiving no punishment while Hester was cursed with the letter that he â€Å"inflicted a hideous torture on himself† by carving the letter A into his own chest (Hawthorne 176). He has also had to endure much from Roger ChillingsworthRead MoreEssay on Scarlet Letter618 Words   |  3 PagesScarlet Letter The Puritan Beliefs As Told Through The Scarlet Letter Nathaniel Hawthorne was not a Puritan. But Hawthrone’s forefathers were Puritans, so he had an understanding of their belief system and their basis behind it. He stated that he hoped the sins of his forefathers had been forgiven. Hoping to expose those ideas which he understood, yet despised, Hawthorne purposely presented many important Puritan beliefs as import aspects to the Scarlet Letter. In the Scarlet Letter, HawthorneRead MoreFeminism in the Scarlet Letter1297 Words   |  6 Pagesto establish the whole relation between man and woman on a surer ground of mutual happiness† (ch.24).The definition of feminism would be women are inherently equal to men and deserve equal rights and opportunities. In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s, The Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne is the key example for feminism in the novel. In Puritan times, women were thought of as lesser than men. Women’s purposes were to raise children and give them good morals and values. Women did not h ave jobs; they wore the plainestRead MoreSummary Of The Scarlet Letter 935 Words   |  4 PagesThe Scarlet Letter is about a woman, Hester Prynne, who has had an affair with a man who she would not name. During the affair Hester became pregnant, so the affair became known to the town. She had the child but would still not reveal who the father was she was then forced to wear a red A representing adulterer on her chest for the rest of her life. The movie Easy A is about Olive Pendergast is an average high school student who is not one of the super-popular girls, but not a loser either

Reciprocity in Subordinate Relationships †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Reciprocity in Subordinate Relationships. Answer: Introduction The treaty of Waitangi was first signed in 1840 by the British Crown representatives and some M?ori chiefs from New Zealand which resulted with British sovereignty over New Zealand. The treaty represents some principles which the British and the M?ori made an agreement to form a nation of New Zealand (Temm, 1990). The articles of the treaty pointed that the sovereignty of New Zealand would be ceded to Britain, that they would get the right to their land and other resources and the Crown got exclusive rights to buy land and the M?ori given the rights and privileges of British subjects (Burns, 1989). Subsequently, New Zealand became a colony of the Crown. Successive governments alienated the M?ori land and resources without the M?ori consent of compensation. The Waitangi tribunal of 1975 was to investigate accusations by the M?ori against the Crown for breaching the treaty principles and to give recommendations to the government on compensation (Belgrave, 2005). This provided a means o f investigating the grievances against previous government and means of settlement. This paper will discuss the principles of the treaty and how these principles can be applied in the work environment. The Principles of the Treaty There is no one agreed list of the treaty principles. The Waitangi tribunal and the courts identify principles in each case. Some principles developed over the span of time while others are now fully developed yet others regarded as controversial (Hayward, 2012). Various principles have been applied to different situations where claims have been raised. Some of the principles that were developed from the Te Tau Ihu Tribunal as they were seen to be appropriate to the inquiry include partnership, reciprocity, autonomy, active protection, options, mutual benefit, equity, equal treatment and redress (New Zealand Government, 2016). These principles are among which will be discussed in this section and their application at the work place. The treaty implied a partnership would exist between the two parties and each side was expected to act reasonably and in good faith which is a typical obligation in all partnerships (Te Puni, 2002).One obligation to the partnership was the M?ori needed to be consulted to get their informed consent about the correct right holders whenever there was a transaction regarding their land and any other resources. The partners are of equal status and there is need for accountability and compromise in the partnership. Partnerships are reciprocal in nature and usually involve exchange for mutual benefit and advantage. The M?ori had ceded the governance of their country to the Crown in exchange for full authority to their land and people and for protection. They expected settlement of their country to be fair and mutually advantageous to both parties. The Crown was expected to protect the M?ori peoples autonomy as they had guaranteed. This was the ability of the M?ori communities to self govern as was the case over the years. They were supposed to drive their own politics, economic and social activities and to behave according to them. They were supposed to retain their customs and institutions and choose their leaders and determine their land issues. The Crown had a duty to protect the M?ori people and their land and all other resources. This requires the full consultation with the people and fair process by the Crown and decision making by the people whose interests were being protected. The M?ori were promised protection of their rights and their interests at the time of the treaty which was meant to secure their acceptance of the treaty. The Crown had an obligation to protect the M?ori in retention of their tribal authority in their community affairs and to live according to their culture (Te Puni, 2002). It was envisaged in the treaty that there would be two sets of people in New Zealand each with their own laws and customers to govern them with an interface governed by mutual respect and partnership. M?oris laws were guaranteed in the treaty and protected and they were to have choices in the new community. They were to continue with their traditional way of life or to adapt to the developing new society or to choose to combine the two worlds without coersion. The two parties to the treaty were expected to benefit from it and the needs of both groups of people needed to be provided for and that sometimes there needed to be compromise to achieve this objective (Te Puni, 2002). The two groups of people, the settlers and the M?ori people, were supposed to retain or obtain resources to help them develop in the new nation they were sharing. The M?ori who sold their land were to have more value in what they retained to ensure they got full benefits from the settlement. The settlement was thus supposed to be of mutual benefit to both groups of people and thus they were supposed to retain sufficient land and resources to achieve this. The Crown was expected to act fairly in the protection of interests of both the settlers and the M?ori people. The settlers interest were not supposed to be given priority over those of the M?ori. The M?ori were not supposed to be disadvantaged but if this were to be the principle of equity required that there were active measures that were put in place to address the disadvantages and restore balance. This principle required the Crown to treat all the M?ori groups fairly and equally and not favor one over the other. None of the groups was supposed to be treated with unfair advantage over the others. Their circumstances, their interest and their rights were broadly the same and thus were to get equal treatment. In case the Crown was in breach of any of these principles of the treaty and the M?ori people were found to have suffered prejudice, then the Crown had a duty to correct the matter. The Crown is expected to take action to restore its honor and integrity and the dignity and status of the M?ori people. Past wrongs would definitely lead to redress and the Crown is expected to restore remedy and resolve any breaches to the treaty. This would include compromise from both sides and ensure no new inequities were created. Reconciliation was required for adequate redress and to enable the M?ori people restored themselves as people and thereafter commit and adhere to the treaty of Waitangi. Treaty Principles Application at Work Partnership is a critical element of labor and employment policies considered by government, employers and also by trade unions with a growing interest and attention in it (Guest Peccei, 2001). At the work place, this principle can be cultivated by encouraging employee consultation, involvement and participation in the day to day organization activities. The individual employee contribution should be valued and their interests are met by encouraging them to make decisions concerning issues that relate to their work. Reciprocity is especially important in managerial relationships and also between members and leaders. It relates to the outcomes at work whether they are positive or negative in manger subordinate relationships. It relates to the obligation that people at work will have based on past behavior (Uhl-Bien Maslyn, 2003). It is therefore important that employees feel treated well at work so that they can have positive reciprocity. If they feel the treatment is not good it might result in negative reciprocity. An organization also needs to have proper guidance on how to handle negative reciprocity as it affects productivity. Individual autonomy combined with low levels of monitoring might lead to low performance. However, higher trust leads to higher team performance when individual autonomy is lower (Langfred, 2004). This principle can lead to increased work performance when individuals and teams are trusted to do their work and enhanced with moderated mediating role. Individuals should be given autonomy but monitored so that performance is not affected negatively and motivation continues to increase. Active protection of employees rights and interest at work should be encouraged so that employees feel valued and safe at work. This requires proper consultation of the employees and fair consideration of what they provide as important for them to be highly productive. The employees also need to feel protected from any kind of unfair practices in the course of their work. They need to be educated on the methods of seeking for fairness in all activities. Having options at work might lead to having motivated employees hence high productivity. Employees should have choices in some element of their work so that they feel valued. An organization may for example allow people to work from home on some of the days if they choose to as long as they deliver on their work. They may also be allowed flexible working hours depending on what works better for them. Even on matters that regards benefits at work, a company may have different packages so that each chooses what works best for their stage in life. Mutual benefit principle requires that employees as individuals and also through their representatives work with management and devise the mutual benefits which relate to their work for example job security, flexibility or performance. If the employee initiatives are to be successful, then the human resource practices need to be progressive and effective (Guest Peccei, 2001). An organization needs to focus on the shared interests and goals of the two parties considering they could other different interests. The policies and practices need to promote the mutual benefit of both employer and employees. Equity at the work place may lead to reduce turnover, increase employee commitment and increase employees ideas that enhance productivity and quality. Traditionally the focus was on efficiency and this needs to be balanced with equity or fair treatment and a chance to have meaningful contribution in decision making (Budd, 2004). Organizations need to have policies that ensure that there are fair practices and that employees are treated fairly. This is especially important when handling grievances where employees need to feel their issues are fairly considered. This may lead to increased commitment and productivity. The equal treatment principle at work implies that nobody enjoys fewer opportunities or rights that another person. Employees should not just feel that they are treated equally but there should be policies and actions that do not discriminate people based on ethnic, gender or any other circumstances (Rees, 2006). If an organization has any existing inequalities that have discriminated against minority groups, appropriate actions need to be taken to correct this. This may include training of minority groups so that they may be accommodated in the roles at work. Redress at work may refer to any third party interventions that may involve either financial or non financial compensation for employees who feel they were disadvantaged Work place bullying or unfairness makes employees likely to experience stress or other physical and psychological problems and other economic consequences like sick leaves, transfers, and layoffs and are often targeted for employment termination (Meglich-Sespico, Farley, 2007). Organizations need to have methods of redress so that they do not suffer the consequences of employees being absent from work, high turnover, low morale and even filing for legal redress which might lead to financial losses in compensation. Appropriate procedures for redress need to be put in place and made known to employees before negative consequences. Conclusion In conclusion, the principles from Waitangi treaty have been incorporated in the work environment for better work relationships and enhanced productivity. This paper has discussed some of the principles and ways in which they can be applied in the work place. The work place is about partnership and these principles can be used to guide how this partnership can be enhanced by fair treatment and consultation of employees in decision making for mutual benefit. The employees also need to feel protected in their work and given options and be trusted to deliver in their roles. In case of breach of the employment contract, there needs a proper mechanism for seeking redress and restoring the partnership. References Belgrave, M. (2005). Historical Frictions: M?ori Claims and Reinvented Histories, Auckland. Budd, J. (2004). Employment with a Human Face: Balancing Efficiency, Equity, and Voice. ILR Press. Burns, P. (1989).Fatal Success: A History of the New Zealand Company. Heinemann Reed. p.153 Guest, D. and Peccei, R. (2001). Partnership at Work: Mutuality and the Balance of Advantage. British Journal of Industrial Relations 39:2, 0007-1080 pp. 207-236. Hayward, J. (2012). Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi ng? m?t?pono o te tiriti - What are the treaty principles?, Te Ara - the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Accessed October 5, 2017 from: https://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/principles-of-the-treaty-of-waitangi-nga-matapono-o-te-tiriti/page-1 Langfred, C. (2004). Too Much of a Good Thing? Negative Effects of High Trust and Individual Autonomy in Self-Managing Teams. Academy of Management Journal: vol. 47no. 3, p385-399. Meglich-Sespico, P. Farley,R. (2007). Relief and Redress for Targets of Workplace Bullying. Springer New Zealand Government. (2016). The Waitangi Tribunal and Treaty principles. Accessed October 5, 2017 from: https://www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz/treaty-of-waitangi/principles-of-the-treaty/ Rees, T. (2006). Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union. Education, Training and Labor Market Policies. London: Routledge. Temm, P. (1990). The Waitangi Tribunal: The Conscience of the Nation, Auckland. Te Puni K?kiri. (2002).He Tirohanga ? Kawa ki te Tiriti o Waitangi: A Guide to the Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi as expressed by the Courts and the Waitangi Tribunal. Te Puni K?kiri: Wellington. Uhl-Bien, M. Maslyn, J. (2003). Reciprocity in Manager-Subordinate Relationships: Components, Configurations, and Outcomes. Management Department Faculty Publications. 13.